That’s a very compelling hypothetical! A Tesla Model 3+ with 500 miles of range, especially if it’s a real-world EPA estimate, would be a game-changer. Recent reports indicate Tesla is indeed preparing to launch a “Model 3+” in China, which is a single-motor, rear-wheel-drive variant rumored to achieve around 800 km (approximately 500 miles) of range on the CLTC cycle. For comparison, the current EPA estimate for the Model 3 Long Range AWD is around 346 miles.
Here’s how I’d weigh that trade:
I would absolutely trade AWD for 500 miles of range from a Tesla Model 3+ in most scenarios.
Here’s why:
- Eliminating Range Anxiety: 500 miles of real-world range would virtually eliminate range anxiety for almost all drivers. Most daily commutes are well under 100 miles, meaning you could go several days or even a full week without needing to charge. For longer road trips, it would drastically reduce the number and duration of charging stops, making EV travel almost as convenient as gasoline cars in terms of refueling frequency. This is perhaps the biggest “quality of life” improvement for an EV owner.
- Efficiency and Cost Savings: Rear-wheel drive (RWD) vehicles are generally more efficient than their AWD counterparts because they have fewer moving parts, are lighter, and consume less energy. This translates to lower electricity costs over the car’s lifetime.
- AWD is Often Overrated for EVs: While AWD provides superior traction in extreme slippery conditions (snow, ice, heavy rain) and faster acceleration, modern RWD EVs with advanced traction control systems (thanks to instant torque and precise motor control) handle surprisingly well in many adverse weather conditions, especially when paired with good tires (like dedicated winter tires if you live in a snowy climate). For most drivers, even those in four-season climates, AWD isn’t a strict necessity. Many EVs are already incredibly quick in RWD, so the extra acceleration of AWD is often more of a “want” than a “need.”
However, there are scenarios where I might hesitate or prefer AWD:
- Harsh Winter Climates / Frequent Off-Pavement Driving: If I lived in an area with consistently heavy snowfall, icy roads, or regularly drove on unpaved, slippery surfaces, the added traction and control of AWD would be a significant advantage.
- Performance Enthusiast: For someone who prioritizes ultimate acceleration and aggressive handling in all conditions, the dual-motor AWD setup offers a noticeable performance boost.
Would you trade a five-seater for a six-seat Tesla with extra power and space?
Would you wait for green hydrogen or plug into the grid today?